WHY AREN'T WE GIVEN THE SAME CHOICES AS THE YANKS?

"

"Republican presidential contender Rick Perry has signed a pledge vowing to support a Constitutional amendment declaring marriage to be a union of one man and one woman, the group sponsoring the pledge said Friday".

By signing the pledge, "Perry makes crystal clear that, contrary to the conventional wisdom, gay marriage is going to be even a bigger issue in 2012 than it was in 2008," Mr Brown said, "because the difference between the GOP nominee and President Obama is going to be large and clear."

Now, this is not about homosexual marriage, although I think most of you who read this pile of shite know my feelings on that, but instead about the choice that the electorate in America in have, as compared to here.  Can you imagine the furore there would be, if one of our 'political parties' stood on a policy of banning homosexual marriage?  Why do we not have the choice?  Surely, in a healthy 'democracy', all strands of opinion should be aired? Should we not be told the policies of the BNP, the anti-Nazi league, the Gay Morris Dancers for free bells, the porridge eating Teuchters association and even the Scottish Labour Party?  If they want to stand for election, we should be told what they stand for.

I'm all for extremists, well apart from the Scottish Labour Party, as what we have at the moment is a huge glob of gooey crap whose policies are much of a muchness.  Let's rip it up and start again!

ARE THE MAINSTREAM POLITICIANS AFRAID OF AV IN CASE IT CHANGES THEIR COSY EXISTENCE?

William Hague has attacked Liberal Democrat plans to introduce Alternative Vote system by declaring 'A vote for AV will be a vote for the BNP'.  (I hope so, Ed).

In a rallying cry to the Tory rank-and-file, the Foreign secretary called the AV system 'unfair' and 'expensive'.

He is seeking to mobilise his party in a bid to save the current first-past-the-post voting system that could be abolished in the upcoming electoral reform referendum.

Now I don't hold any truck with the BNP and AV as a voting system is about as much use as a fart in a spacesuit, however what it does show is that the Conservatives and Labour are afraid of a Westminster where a range of views are heard, instead of MPs being acquiescent to the wishes of their party whips and trooping into their parties lobby.

I believe that the Scottish Parliament was improved by the likes of Tommy Sheridan's crew and it is my fervent hope that George Galloway gets elected this time.  We need a range of different views at Westminster.  MPs who are not beholden to their party for promotion or Government jobs and can actually help their constituents.  I also think without the Libdums, we would have seen much more extremist policies from the Tories and although I wouldn't have disagreed with all of them after 13 tears of shite from Labour.  I see the bastards are kicking up again about IPSO, if they don't like it they can resign.  All this pish about their expenses claims not being honoured making them unable to do their jobs properly looking after their constituents, is the biggest load of crap, I have ever heard.

It's time we rumbled up the whole Palace of Westminster, starting with the Lords and the political placemen who sit in 'that place' and collect over £1000 per week in expenses, some of which have criminal convictions like Lord Watson, who should have had his enoblement taken off him.

Why should we continue to pay £billions of OUR MONEY, to keep this shambles of an Establishment going.  The time for change is here, now.

BNP PANDA PROTEST IN EDINBURGH

DOES SCOTLAND WANT FURTHER MUSLIM INTEGRATION?

It's funny, sometimes themes for blogposts just seem to come up in batches, I seem to be in a Paki/Muslim bashing mode over the last few days, but here I go again!


I came across a BBC Scotland article, HERE, on Muslim integration or not in Scotland and the salient facts are thus:

• Integration is easier for Muslims in Scotland than in England.
• Six out of 10 Scots believed Muslims were integrated into everyday Scottish life.
• Scots have a less favourable opinion of Muslims than other religious groups.
•  One of the barriers to adapting to Scottish life was the country's drinking culture.
• As most social events in Scotland were seen to revolve around drinking alcohol, many Muslims felt they could not often fully integrate.
• Two-thirds (65%) of respondents had a favourable opinion towards Muslims. - three times as many as those with an unfavourable opinion (21%).
• However, Muslims were viewed less favourably than any of the other religious groups asked about.
• The survey,  also found that 46% of those questioned think that Muslims living in Scotland were loyal to the country while 33% thought they were not.
• A total of 66% of Scots thought the attempted bombing of Glasgow Airport in July 2007 had made people in Scotland less tolerant of Muslims, while 48% thought Scotland would begin to lose its identity if more Muslims came to live there.
• There was a strong feeling among Muslims that integration in Scotland was largely one-way - with Muslims making the effort to adapt to Scottish life.
• However, among non-Muslim Scots, the dominant view was that that Muslims have to make more of an effort to interact and should completely adopt Scottish customs.
• Factors such as speaking in their own language and wearing traditional dress - particularly the veil - were seen as evidence that they were not integrating.

What do I think?  Well without wanting to sound like a BNP rant.  I love my country.  I also love my heritage and the history of my country.  That does not include a sizable non-white, non-Scottish, non-Christian/Jewish, (and I'm not too keen on Zionists), coterie, who seem to be increasing day by day.  This is a white country and I fucked if I am going to apologize for it.  I am fed up being proud of my white heritage and being told I am a racist.  If I am, so be it.  My country's most famous King's heart, was thrown into the Moorish hordes by the Black Douglas and that eventuality is emblazoned on my heart also.  I don't have a problem, well not too much, with MULTI RACIALISM but if people of other faiths and customs want to come here, then they must adopt the CULTURE of the host country.  Why should Scots integrate to a IMMIGRANT'S CULTURE?  If they are unable to do that, then they should choose a country where they  can.  I don't want this country to become like parts of England like Blackburn and some parts of London where it is 'spot the white man time'.  I say Scotland for Scots, Pakistan for Pakistanis, (nearly tempted there) and India for Indians.  BTW, before anyone calls me a white supremist, I don't want Aussies, Kiwis or White South Africans, either.  It's our shite weather, why should you enjoy it if your own countries are too hot for you!

THE NEW GOVERNMENT WHOEVER IT IS, MUST CONTROL IMMIGRATION

According to government statistics, one immigrant arrives every minute, and a new British passport is issued every three. In the past ten years, almost 750,000 British people have left the country, and 2.5 million immigrants have arrived.



The rate of inflow is 25 times higher than any previous period of immigration since the Norman Conquest.  Last month it emerged, under the Freedom of Information Act, that far from being unexpected, this massive increase was sanctioned by the Blair Cabinet - not least to ensure a strong backing for Labour from the new immigrants at successive elections.

The new government whoever it is, must put an end to the immigration influx that we have seen in the last thirteen years.  As increasing financial pressure comes to bear on the NHS and Schools any new usage is like a cut back.  If for instance we allow another five percent immigration that is the same as cutting the budgets by five percent.  Along with the pressure that puts on housing, social security and basic infrastructure that will create 'tinderbox' areas of the country, where the BNP and other parties with radical views will thrive.

The next few years is not the time to increase immigration because the south-east of England needs CHEAP LABOUR!

WOOLAS PREDICTS ELECTION VIOLENCE FROM THE BNP!

BNP thugs will try to provoke violence during the general election campaign in London, a government minister warned today. 

Immigration minister Phil Woolas said there was no doubt that “bad people” in the racist party — whose leader Nick Griffin is standing for election in Barking and Dagenham — would “like to cause trouble”.  Mr Woolas said the Met police and the Crown Prosecution Service were preparing for a surge in public order offences and taking precautions.  “You allow free speech of course, but you take measures to ensure that inflammatory incidents and events are not juxtaposed,” (WTF?)  he said.

If I was anything to do with the BNP, I would be watching very closely for NULABOUR ACTIVISTS having their heads shaved and kidding on they're BNP MEMBERS.  There's nothing better Labour would like than BNP VIOLENCE AND RIOTS.

DON'T FIGHT ON OUR RECORD-BROWN TELLS PARTY ACTIVISTS!

Labour is telling its workers not to campaign on the party's record in power, a leaked document showed yesterday.
The revelation came ahead of today's launch by Gordon Brown of Operation Fightback, at which he will tell activists to wage a political scrap for survival.  But the leaked document is an astonishing admission that voters have little to show for 13 years of Labour rule.
'Labour needs to ensure that the next election is seen not as a referendum on the government but as a big choice about the change we want for Britain.'  In a speech in the West Midlands, Mr Brown will unveil the party's election slogan as Operation Fightback, a line also used by the British National Party.

That's a handy slogan to be using because if they don't watch their step the BNP will have more votes and that will be down to this UNPOPULAR P.M.  What a sad day for Britain that these Jokers even still have a party to fight with after the LAST THIRTEEN YEAR'S dismal record in power.

UKIP PROPOSE BAN ON WEARING OF BURKAS AND NIQABS IN PUBLIC

The UK Independence Party is to call for a ban on the burka and the niqab — the Islamic cloak that covers women from head to toe and the mask that conceals most of the face — claiming they affront British values.

The policy, which a number of European countries are also debating, is an attempt by UKIP to broaden its appeal and address the concerns of disaffected white working-class voters.  UKIP would be the first national party to call for a total ban on burkas, though the far-Right BNP believes they should be banned from schools.
 
Lord Pearson of Rannoch, the leader of UKIP, said yesterday: “We are taking expert advice on how we could do it. It makes sense to ban the burka — or anything which conceals a woman’s face — in public buildings. But we want to make it possible to ban them in private buildings. It isn’t right that you can’t see someone’s face in an airport.”  He explained that UKIP wanted to bring to the fore the issue of the increasing influence of Sharia in Britain: “We are not Muslim bashing, but this is incompatible with Britain’s values of freedom and democracy.” (Strange choice of words when you want to ban something).

I think it will be surprising how many people will vote for a 'single issue party' at the coming election.  I just caught the tail end of 'Question Time' last night, but I'm sure I heard one of the panelists saying that one of her constituents was going to vote BNP because 'they were going to sort out the wheelie bins'!  Sometimes you forget how stupid people can be.  I think if I was in  England, my vote would certainly be going to UKIP.  Are UKIP the 'thinking mans'" BNP.  I don't think so and they are promising to flesh out their policies unlike some of the other parties.  Remember they came second to the Tories in England in the EURO elections and depending on how many votes they get, the election will be greatly influenced.  If Labour lose votes to the BNP, them the Tories will lose votes to UKIP, particularly amongst disaffected Tory voters who wanted a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty.

LABOUR'S NEW PROJECT-BRITISH JOBS FOR MIGRANT WORKERS!

A scheme to relax immigration laws to allow tens of thousands of unskilled workers to enter the country to build Olympic sites is being drawn up for ministers.
Migrant workers may be needed to complete the stadiums for the 2012 Games and also to work on separate engineering projects, Government advisers believe.
But the prospect of a new wave of immigration for construction schemes - at a time when the recession has seen nearly 200,000 construction workers laid off in the past year - provoked furious protests last night.

Projects which may need to draw in migrant workers - both unskilled and skilled - from outside Europe include the Crossrail tunnel in London, the High Speed Two railway line to the north, and the decommissioning of old nuclear and coalfired power stations.  Migrants may also be needed to prepare for a possible football World Cup in England in 2018, a paper drawn up by Home Office advisers suggests.  An invitation to foreign workers to take part in showpiece projects would mean the abandonment of Labour's 'points based' immigration system upon which ministers are relying to cut immigration.

This is just an invitation to the BNP to cause trouble in East London and other parts of the country where large building projects are being built with the help of MIGRANT LABOUR.  Has no-one apart from the BNP got a policy on immigration FIVE MONTHS AWAY FROM A GENERAL ELECTION?

A RELIGIOUS LEADER TALKS SENSE!

New immigrants coming to Britain should have an understanding of the country's Christian heritage, a former Archbishop of Canterbury said today.

Lord Carey is part of an alliance of leading public figures demanding immigration to be urgently curbed to stop the population hitting 70million and causing ‘serious harm’ to society.

Lord Carey stressed today that he was not calling for a ban on non-Christian immigrants settling in Britain, but warned that if concerns about the level and nature of immigration were not addressed, it simply would play into the hands of the far right British National Party.
'What I think we must call for is an understanding on the part of those who come into our country that they are coming into one which values parliamentary democracy, which is built upon our Christian heritage,' he said.
'They have got to understand our commitment to the English language and espouse it, and they must understand our history.'

For once we find a Religious Leader talking sense.  Nobody, well apart from the NUTJOBS in the BNP want to stop all immigration, but immigrants must understand that while we tolerate MULTI-NATIONALISM we cannot any longer tolerate MULTI-CULTURISM.  Immigrants who wish to come to this country and settle must be prepared to adhere to the HOST CULTURE of the country and accept our morals, laws, history and customs otherwise the far right will have the opportunity to exploit the fractures in our society.

NICK GRIFFIN TO PROTEST AT HIS TREATMENT ON TENSION TIME!

THE BNP GET THEIR FIRST BLACK MEMBER!

The BBC was accused last night of letting BNP bigot Nick Griffin 'play the martyr' amid bitter recriminations over his appearance on Question Time.
Senior MPs accused the corporation of whipping up controversy to maximise viewing figures - then crudely stage-managing the programme so he was under attack throughout from the audience and fellow panellists. They said the attempt to expose his racist views risked backfiring because some voters would feel he had been unfairly treated.


Last night it emerged that:
Complaints that the show was biased against Mr Griffin outnumbered by more than two to one those about him being allowed to appear;
Some of the audience appear to have been rushed through the vetting process in a bid to emphasise the multi-cultural nature of London;
Audience members were briefed to ask 'provocative' questions and host David Dimbleby told them it was acceptable to boo;
More than eight million people tuned in - four times the usual audience and more than watched Strictly Come Dancing last week ( I WOULD FUCKING HOPE SO!);
The BNP boasted that since Mr Griffin's appearance, 3,000 people had registered to sign up as members;
Joel Weiner, 17, who dramatically confronted Mr Griffin about Holocaust denial, said he applied to attend a Question Time programme more than a year ago, but was approached just 24 hours before filming.

JUST AS WE HAVE SAID ON THIS BLOG GUYS, THE BBC MADE A FUCKING ARSE OF IT!

NICK GRIFFIN ON QUESTION TIME

Nick Griffin was booed, jeered and mocked by a hostile television audience on the BBC's Question Time last night.
But the British National Party leader's priceless air time still left the Corporation facing accusations of 'publicity-seeking' naivety.
Senior Labour figures warned of racist attacks in the coming days, leaving the BBC with 'blood on its hands'.

THAT'S THE MAIL'S VIEW.

What do I think? I know most of you don't give a monkey's chuff, but here goes!

Well first I believe the BBC did it's usual stitch up job. The audience were from West London, where naturally they are multi-racial and I have never seen so many skull caps and coloured people in the audience in many years of watching Question Time.

The Panel consisted of two people of Jewish extraction, a Muslim Woman and a black American "intellectual". They obviously thought it was their duty to attack the BNP policies instead of answering the questions, in particular Jack Straw who tried to take over the show and whose party, the Labour party, are to blame for the BNP's rise to prominence.

Nick Griffin, particularly at the beginning looked nervous and shifty when questioned by members of the audience. He was however in my opinion, not put under the spotlight enough so that his policies could be scrutinised and this was the fault of Dimbleby.

Towards the end of the programme he improved and a number of the other panelists were unable to answer his questions on immigration, particularly Straw and this will resonate in his BNP heartland which is not West London but the North of England.

How did Nick Griffin and the BNP come out of it? Well I think in the areas in which they will get votes, they will get more votes because the management of the programme was very poor and will go against the British Peoples' inert feeling of fairness to the extent that he looked bullied and no-one likes a bully!