SHOULD STRAW BE CHARGED OR BE MADE TO PAY COMPENSATION?

Just how culpable should politicians be for their decisions?  In signing off on the sending of the man above for rendition to Libya and his alleged torture, should Straw be charged with a criminal offence?  If Behadj gets compensation through the courts, should Straw have to pay it?  Does the culpability go all the way to the top and should it then involve the PM at the time, Blair.

Is there anyone who wouldn't want to see that bastard, hung, drawn and quartered?

WELL DONE ALL IN THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT-YOU TOLD THEM TO FUCK OFF!

THE Scottish Government has flatly rejected a request by senators in Washington to testify on its role in the decision to free the Lockerbie bomber.
Within minutes of the request being made, the Scottish Government announced that neither Mr MacAskill nor Dr Fraser would be accepting the invitation.The Scottish Government justified the decision on the grounds that they had "no contact of any kind" with BP.
Instead they say they will only deal with questions from senators in writing, and from this side of the Atlantic. 

Well done my Government.  I asked you to tell them to FUCK OFF and YOU DID!  Quite rightly.  How dare a legislature in another sovereign country ask the leaders of another country to appear before them.  Tell Obama to come over here and explain RENDITION FLIGHTS landing at Prestwick Airport.
Jack Straw and the original POODLE, TONY BLAIR have also been 'invited' and although I hate RAT BOY AND WEASEL, I hope they turn it down as well.

Kenny MacAskill has however said that he doesn't mind appearing at a meeting to be convened in the Hague.  That's it KENNY, get the Yanks on strange turf and then bring up all the shite we know has been buried by the CIA about Lockerbie and the part they played in it and what they knew prior to it happening.  Oh and you could maybe ask them about the part the American Government played in getting oil exploration rights in Libya for their oil companies.  Four times more than what BP, have had.

I AGREE WITH JACK STRAW-I MUST BE LOSING IT!

Jack Straw, (the weasel faced bastard), is said to be working on plans to include the abolition of the HOUSE OF LORDS and it's replacement with an elected SENATE, modelled on the American legislature with elections held at the same time as a General Election with members being able to sit for a maximum of three, five year terms.

Strangely enough, for once in my life, I broadly agree with LABOUR!  I think it's time we got rid of the House of Lords and it should be elected.  I don't agree though that it should be elected at the same time as at a General Election.  If it was, it would broadly reflect the same vote as the make-up of the Commons, even if it was by proportional representation.  It would be much better if it was elected MID-TERM and then perhaps it would be of a different make-up to the Commons and consequently it would not necessarily agree with the voting intentions of the upper house and would therefore be better placed to be a check on the Government of the day.  It shouldn't be able to make legislation but should be used to scrutinise what the Upper house is doing and if necessary send it back to them for amending.

The wearing of ermine robes should not be compulsory!

WHEN BONNIE GREER MET NICK GRIFFIN

I'd like to give you for your perusal a piece of text I lifted from the article in the LONDON EVENING STANDARD by DAVID COHEN, (an interesting choice of journalist?), WHEN BONNIE GREER MET NICK GRIFFIN, sorry I don't know how to link it.

Why was she not more strident in her attacks on him? "I didn't need to, because others like Jack Straw waded in so heavily. I felt my job was to subtly lampoon him, toy with him, expose the idiocy of his ideas.
"I didn't want to come across as the angry, screaming black woman pointing my finger and hollering because that's how people like Griffin and his supporters view black women. I saw us as a team - it wasn't an ego thing, wasn't as if I had to take him down all on my own."
There was a touching moment, she says, just before they started recording when Sayeda Warsi ran over to her and said: "Are you okay sitting next to Griffin?" "I said: 'I'm from Chicago, I'm not scared of this guy!' And we just hugged spontaneously. We were like two prize-fighters going into the ring to do battle."

TELLS YOU A LOT ABOUT THE MINDSET OF THE PANEL!

NICK GRIFFIN ON QUESTION TIME

Nick Griffin was booed, jeered and mocked by a hostile television audience on the BBC's Question Time last night.
But the British National Party leader's priceless air time still left the Corporation facing accusations of 'publicity-seeking' naivety.
Senior Labour figures warned of racist attacks in the coming days, leaving the BBC with 'blood on its hands'.

THAT'S THE MAIL'S VIEW.

What do I think? I know most of you don't give a monkey's chuff, but here goes!

Well first I believe the BBC did it's usual stitch up job. The audience were from West London, where naturally they are multi-racial and I have never seen so many skull caps and coloured people in the audience in many years of watching Question Time.

The Panel consisted of two people of Jewish extraction, a Muslim Woman and a black American "intellectual". They obviously thought it was their duty to attack the BNP policies instead of answering the questions, in particular Jack Straw who tried to take over the show and whose party, the Labour party, are to blame for the BNP's rise to prominence.

Nick Griffin, particularly at the beginning looked nervous and shifty when questioned by members of the audience. He was however in my opinion, not put under the spotlight enough so that his policies could be scrutinised and this was the fault of Dimbleby.

Towards the end of the programme he improved and a number of the other panelists were unable to answer his questions on immigration, particularly Straw and this will resonate in his BNP heartland which is not West London but the North of England.

How did Nick Griffin and the BNP come out of it? Well I think in the areas in which they will get votes, they will get more votes because the management of the programme was very poor and will go against the British Peoples' inert feeling of fairness to the extent that he looked bullied and no-one likes a bully!