Showing posts with label ARSEWIPE BROWN. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ARSEWIPE BROWN. Show all posts

Wednesday, 16 November 2011

BROWN FINALLY SPOTTED AT GOULD FUNERAL!

Gordon Brown was finally spotted yesterday at the funeral of Elliot Gould, the former party policy planner.  I would say there is plenty of body language in Brown's facial expression when he sees Blair, as in "Christ, not that fucker, how do I avoid him"!

But, why are we paying this man's salary.  Now to be fair to him, apart from his book, (available now from all bargain book stores in time for Christmas, price £1.99), he doesn't seem to be  making as much as he can on the back of being a PM.  Not like that other fucker who went before him.  He did of course want the job as head of the IMF, but unfortunately for him, as a Presbyterian, he had no chance in a job which the Jewish bankers reserve for one of their own.

He did once say he was going to work in an Oxfam shop, but allegedly they wouldn't let him in case he started throwing shitty charity stuff about while smiling.  I suppose he could have kept an eye in the shop when the workers were at lunch!

Wednesday, 22 June 2011

IS CAMERON RIGHT TO TELL THE ARMED FORCES TO BACK OFF?

CAMERON TELLS THE ARMED FORCES, "UP YOURS"


David Cameron has laid bare his frustration with forces chiefs questioning the sustainability of Britain's military commitments, telling them: "You do the fighting and I'll do the talking." The Prime Minister was forced to insist that the mission in Libya can be maintained for as long as necessary after the concerns of the RAF's second-in-command were leaked. 

But is Cameron right?  I don't believe so.  It is surely he duty of commanders to question the viability of operations particularly if their men are stretched by lack of numbers or vital supplies?  I hope we have got over the days of the 1st World War when troops were seen as cannon fodder whose lives didn't matter a damn. 

Ultimately, although it's never happened in this country, the Armed Forces loyalty should be to the people, not the politicians or for that matter, the Royal family.  It always surprises me, although it shouldn't, the way armed personnel have this huge commitment to the Royal family.  I remember being in the Scouts when I was but a slip of a lad and the same thing was rammed into us then, so perhaps it's not surprising.  I come from a family where my father used to stand up for 'God Save the Queen', when it used to come on at the end of programming on TV for the night! 

It is sad though that the Armed Forces don't seem to be able to think for themselves.  Perhaps this is the start of them doing it.  I hope so, because failed politicians like Brown and Blair are lauded with riches, instead of being put where they should be, in jail.  If politicians were held accountable for their decisions and particularly, sending troops into conflicts where we have no right to be, then perhaps they would be of a higher calibre.

Monday, 23 May 2011

RYAN GIGGS IS A BASTARD, BUT THE INJUNCTION IS RIGHT.

I have been following this Giggs shite on Twatter.  Everybody and their dog knew who it was.

But was the injunction right?  I believe he had the right.  He doesn´t affect my life.  I couldn´t care less who he shags, although I think the bastard treated the silly wee lassie poorly.  What does affect me is when a politician gets a superinjunction, because for instance he has been caught shagging a goat in a Zoo.  They have some influence over my life, unlike a prick footballer.

Now I might get myself in trouble and my new found wealth may be taken from me if I recall who it was. 

OK, fuck it!  The person in question, is Gordon Brown.  Yes, that Gordon Brown.  The one who is not goimng to get the IMF job, the twat!

Hasta luego, caballeros.  Es necisito mas sol para me!

Monday, 25 April 2011

ISN'T IT TIME THAT TIRED OLD TWAT BROWN RESIGNED HIS SEAT?


The former Labour Prime Minister is being paid an average of £50,000 per speech, his latest entry in the Commons' register of interest reveals.  Isn't it time he resigned as an  MP and went and did other things?

He once said he'd like to work in a charity shop.  Couldn't McDonalds offer him a job cooking the fries or something?  Or maybe someone could get him a cleaners job in an office, somewhere where he wouldn't have too much responsibility?  Or if it's true he's being headhunted why don't we send him to Papua New Guinea?  They appreciate a man's head there.

Monday, 11 April 2011

BROWN THE ONE-EYED HALFWIT, FINALLY ADMITS RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL CRISIS!


In his first clear admission of some responsibility for the financial crisis, the former prime minister claimed he had not understood how “entangled” the world’s financial institutions had become.

They come as the Treasury prepares to receive a review into how Britain’s banks should operate in the future. The Independent Commission on Banking (ICB), led by Sir John Vickers, is expected to recommend significant reforms to make it less likely that banks take unnecessary risks and to encourage greater competition

The sad Twat said: “We set up the FSA believing the problem would come from the failure of an individual institution. That was the big mistake. We didn’t understand just how entangled things were.”
He added “I have to accept my responsibility.” 

At last!  Ed Miliband must be delighted now that he can move on.  The trouble is that Labour should not be back in power until he is a very old man.  I actually think the coalition, (short of my ideal of Scottish independence), is doing not too badly from the point of view that the LibDums are taking the edge off the Tories most radical plans and what is left is certainly less big business and more people orientated.  Which of course, is what it should be, unless they are, as we all suspect,  being played by big business and the banks, the banks being, you know who, those people I get into a row for mentioning too often, not that, that, will stop me.

What Elmer GrayFudd will make of his Uncle Gordon being the useless fucker we all knew he was, is anyone's guess!

Tuesday, 23 November 2010

SHOULD BROWN AND MORE PARTICULARLY DARLING NOT BE PROSECUTED?



Britain is in danger of being sucked into yet more multi-billion-pound EU rescue packages as the Irish bailout threatens to spiral out of control.
Under the terms of a deal signed by Alistair Darling after Labour lost the May election, the UK can be required to offer guarantees to other EU countries until 2013.
So if the chaos continues to spread through Europe, we could have to bankroll other ‘basket-case’ economies such as Portugal and even Spain.

It seems this agreement was signed just a few days AFTER the election, when things were still unclear and I remember it at the time.  Now I firmly believe that the signing of this agreement was at the behest of the bankers, the Illuminati, and Darling was given no option.  Now Cameron and Osborne will know that, because they are best pals with the Rothschilds after the Yacht incident with Mandelson.  They are, IMO, the power behind many countries and ours is no different.  They own all the preference 'A' shares in the Bank of England and run the Fed in the US.  Look up the Rothschilds and research their history, don't take my word for it.

Anyway, Brown and Darling as the two principals have committed this country to £billions of pounds to prop up the Euro and the ailing European economies through this agreement.  Osborne says his hands are tied.  But, should we not be dragging Brown and at the very least Darling through the British Courts charged with at the best negligence and at the worst downright treason in committing us to these payments.

If a company director, whose company was going bust, made decisions like this about his company, the Revenue and Customs would demand at the very least that any losses were paid back through personal assets and that, they be struck off as a company director for at least 10 years.  So why do these fuckers, get away with it and keep their MPs jobs? 

Saturday, 30 October 2010

NEARLY ALL THE JOBS CREATED UNDER LABOUR WENT TO IMMIGRANTS!

POLISH RECYCLING CONSULTANTS (BINMEN)

Nearly nine out of ten jobs created under Labour went to foreign-born workers, astonishing figures revealed last night. 
Official statistics showed the vast majority of the rise in the employment total under the last Government was accounted for by workers born abroad. 
Total numbers of those in work went up by two million during 13 years of Labour. But of those jobs, 1.8 million individuals were classed as ‘non-UK born’. 
Just a quarter of a million declared themselves to be born in the UK.

"BRITISH JOBS FOR BRITISH WORKERS", roared Brown.
  The one-eyed fuckwit! 

Tuesday, 25 May 2010

A RADICAL SOLUTION TO THE FINANCIAL CRISIS-CULL THE 'COFFINDODGERS'


Today, I would like to make a recommendations to the Cameron Government.  Compulsory retirement at aged 65 for everybody and a CULL of all COFFINDODGERS when they reach 75.

This would free NHS spending for us younger people who need it.  It would save £billions in Pensions, free TV licenses, bus passes and the Winter fuel allowance.  It would also help employment as the funeral industry would have to take on extra staff for digging graves and the like.  All their assets should also go to the state, thereby allowing us to pay of the debt that GORDON BROWN and the BANKERS, (sounds like a 60's group), ran up, when he allowed them free rein. 
To balance the equation, we should help pensioners enjoy their last 10 years by giving them free membership of bowling and golf clubs for the men and positions of responsibility in the W.R.I. for the women.  Fair's fair.  By the time the Arthritis sets in by the age of 75, they'll be happy to unburden themselves on society.  Quite but dignified funerals will be arranged by the state and paid out of their assets.  Their families will be saved the pain of watching their elderly relatives suffer as they do now or worse suffer the shock that can happen when a Father or Mother pops their clogs, unexpectedly.

All in all, a much more dignified end to some one's life.  I would anticipate that if this scheme runs for exactly 19 years 6 months, we will have more than paid off the National Debt and we can let those lucky people who will have reached 74 years by that time, live the rest of their lives, until the end comes naturally. 

Saturday, 22 May 2010

LET'S GET THIS 'DEFICIT' QUESTION INTO PROPORTION


With full respect to the post below, I saw this and suddenly woke up.

Let me run this imaginary scenario past you.
My wife and I both have good jobs, but we spend money like fuck!  In fact in overdraft at the bank and in credit cards we are £1,300,000 overdrawn.  Ridiculous I know, but stick with me.  Now although as high fliers we earn £50,000 per month, we are actually spending £13,000 per month more than we are earning.  That means that we will be £156,000 MORE OVERDRAWN at the end of the year.
Now the bank we deal with is starting to get a little concerned at our financial situation.  HOWEVER WE HAVE A PLAN!  My wife is going to stop buying DESIGNER SHOES this year and that will save £6,000, so we'll only have a DEFICIT THIS YEAR OF £150,000 to add to our existing overdraft of £1.3m, meaning we will owe £1,450,000 at the end of the year.  The Bank have accepted our plan and although my wife wanted to wait until next year to stop buying shoes and implement it, she's accepted that we need to do it now.

AND THAT LADIES AND GENTLE PERSONS IS THE STATE OF THE UNITED KINGDOM TODAY AFTER 13 YEARS OF THAT USELESS BASTARD BROWN AND HIS CRONIES!

Thursday, 13 May 2010

INTIMATE BROWN PHOTO FROM CABINET ROOM


FUCK OFF YOU USELESS, ONE-EYED TWAT AND TAKE YOUR CRABBIT WIFE AND SNOTTY WEANS WITH YOU. 

 GOOD FUCKING RIDDANCE!

Sunday, 9 May 2010

ANYBODY STUDY BODY LANGUAGE?


Tell me this, those of you who like me study BODY LANGUAGE.  Looking at the above photo, what do you think the chances of CLEGG AND BROWN forming a coalition are?

I would say, NONE AND FUCK ALL!

Tuesday, 19 January 2010

RELIEF AID FOR HAITI-WHY AM I GETTING CONFUSED?


The European Union has promised to provide more than 420 million euros (£369m) in aid to help those affected by the devastating earthquake in Haiti. 
The money will deliver both emergency and long-term assistance to the country which was torn apart by the magnitude 7.0 quake.

Now don't please get me wrong.  I think that we individually and nationally should contribute to the Haiti appeal.  Ax I've said I've been to that Island many times on holiday and the suffering and devastation are insufferable.

But here's what I don't understand.  Since the Lisbon Treaty was ratified, we in Britain are now part of the EU one hundred percent.  So if the EU is giving £369m towards the disaster, why is Cyclops in London pledging another £20m.  Now I don't mind if the GREAT LEADER says to the EU, "look we in Britain would also like to contribute something, so we'll chip in a bit more into the pot."  As a net contributor, Britain's share of the EU's assistance will already be a big percentage of the total.

So why isn't Arsewipe going or indeed the EU going to countries like Estonia and saying, "look you're net beneficiaries from the EU,  would you mind chipping in £5m to the pot".  I suppose what I'm trying to say without sounding callous, IS WHY ARE WE CONTRIBUTING TWICE, WHEN we are the last major EU ECONOMY TO COME OUT OF RECESSION?  And why when we are now an integral part of the EU, don't we let them CONTRIBUTE FOR ALL OF US?