Showing posts with label HOMOSEXUALS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label HOMOSEXUALS. Show all posts

Tuesday, 16 August 2011

WHAT IS THIS LIBERAL BRAINWASHING PISH?

From the 'Telegraph' 
 
Gay birds are just as faithful to each other as straight pairs, a study has shown.
Scientists have found same-sex pairs of zebra finches sing to and preen each other as much as heterosexual 'couples'.
The study of finches, whose singing is thought to strengthen bonds between mates, is reported in the journal Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology.
Lead researcher Julie Elie, from the University of California Berkeley, said: "The research showed relationships in animals can be more complicated than just a male and a female who meet and reproduce, even in birds. 

What the fuck is this liberal, wishy-washy pish?  Is this supposed to make us think that a homosexual lifestyle for animals is natural?  Because two birds get confused?  Is it just the ones with the fluffy feathers that become, well, a bit strange?  Has anyone ever seen these male finches shagging each other?

Or is this just another case of the systematic brainwashing of the Western World into accepting that Homosexual behaviour is normal?


(A GUEST POST BY DR. DAVID SHARKEY)

Wednesday, 19 January 2011

ANTI HOMOSEXUAL BED AND BREAKFAST COUPLE FINED-BUT IS IT RIGHT?

Mr and Mr Smith would like the honeymoon suite, George.

I see the couple who run the Bed and Breakfast establishment in their home, who were set up by a couple of activist Homosexuals, have been fined £1,800. I blogged on this in March last year and we had a good debate then, but without going over old ground and for the benefit of new readers, does this seem fair?

Briefly, the case was brought by a couple of Homosexuals who targeted a Christian Couple's Bed and Breakfast, which they ran in their own home as a small business.  This was done deliberately to test the Christian couple's beliefs of Homosexuality.  The case was brought by the EHRC, (the Equalities and Human Rights Commission), who paid for the Homosexuals legal costs.  The Judge gave them leave to appeal the case to a higher court, which illustrated to me, that perhaps he wasn't in full agreement of the law or wasn't sure of his legal ground.

So who's case was the strongest?  The Homosexual activists or the Christian couple.  Are all people equal but some people are more equal than others?  What would I have done?  Well as most of you know, I don't have any religious convictions, but I am certainly Homophobic to a certain degree, like most Heterosexual men, if they were being truthful.  I would have allowed them in, on the condition, that if they made a mess of the sheets, they were going to pay extra, as I would with a Heterosexual couple, if I was being honest.

Actually, I'm a lying bastard,  I would have told them we were full up or made some other excuse.

Tuesday, 21 December 2010

PETER TATCHELL, TRIES TO OVERTURN THE GAY MARRIAGE BAN.

PETER TATCHELL, A MAN, WHOSE FACE, YOU COULD NEVER, GET SICK KICKING  


Eight British couples will argue that the  ban on same-sex marriages, are unlawful and should be reversed.

Over the past two months, homosexual couples have been refused marriage licenses at register offices across England. The couples will file a joint application to the court today, the fifth anniversary of the first civil partnership ceremonies in England.   They will argue that the ban on
homosexual marriages is a breach of the Human Rights Act, specifically the right to respect for private and family life, the right to marry, and the prohibition of discrimination.  Peter Tatchell, who is coordinating the "Equal Love" campaign, said bans on same-sex civil marriages were "a form of sexual apartheid". "Outlawing black marriages would provoke uproar," said Mr Tatchell. "The prohibition on gay marriages should provoke similar outrage."

That IMO, is absolute bollox, you won't be surprised to hear!  Marriage is between a man and a wife as defined by World religions.  If Homosexuals want to get together, that's fine by me and they should have all the rights that couples living together, have now.  If they want to call it a civil partnership, I don't like it, but that's up to them.  Why do Homosexuals like all minorities push so fucking hard.  Don't they realize that's what gets peoples' backs up?

We've discussed at length here and on the various blogs, that we all visit about Homosexuality being the first Marxist step to breakdown of society and you'll all have your own views on that.  Figures show that there are more failed Homosexual relationships than Heterosexual ones and in many cases nowadays, children are involved.  Do I think that Homosexuals should bring up children.  Absolutely not.  Call me Homophobic.  I don't give a fuck.  My opinion is my opinion and there is one of you who always votes, PISH, when I do a Homosexual subject and when I find out who you are, you're in trouble!

Tuesday, 14 December 2010

OBAMA-AMERICANS EITHER TOO FAT OR GAY TO SERVE IN US ARMY!


The First Lady claimed that one in four young Americans are unqualified to serve in the armed forces because they are too fat.

‘Childhood obesity isn’t just a public health issue, it’s not just an economic threat, it’s a national security threat as well,’ she said.
Joint effort: U.S. President Barack Obama speaking before signing into law the new health act,while his wife Michelle looks on

Allied to the fact that almost
40% of the army are now Homosexual after gay shagging, at drug parties, there's hardly anyone left to fight.  Of the remainder, 30% are black leaving only, only 5% able to fight.  Fortunately this group are all white and Republicans and they're going to 'ASSKICK' any 'FUCKING TOWELHEAD', who gets in their way.  So we can expect the American nation to be hated around the World for a while yet.

Saturday, 11 December 2010

CZECH TEST TO DETERMINE HOMOSEXUALS TO BE OUTLAWED BY THE EU!


The EU has told Czech Republic to stop its controversial practice of trying to determine whether asylum seekers are gay by showing them blue movies to gauge their 'sexual arousal' levels.
Those subjected to what Czechs referred to as the 'porno exam' were men claiming asylum on the grounds they would be in danger in their homelands due to their sexuality.
If any of the applicants got aroused at the sight of men and women having sex they were automatically denied asylum rights.
Asylum seekers had to watch both 'straight' and gay porn. Sensors were attached to the private parts and linked up to a computer to test whether they were stimulated or not

If they were aroused during 'straight' porn, like the work of Jenna Jameson, they were automatically denied asylum rights
If they were aroused during 'straight' porn, like the work of Jenna Jameson, they were automatically denied asylum rights
A Prague interior minister spokesman said the tests had been valuable in determining whether men were really gay or not but the EU said they were clearly a breach of the human rights charter of the bloc.
The men were shown both 'straight' and gay porno films by Czech officials. Sensors were attached to the private parts, linked up to a computer, to test whether they were stimulated or not.


Trust the EU to get rid of a brilliant idea.  There you are, arriving in a foreign country and as soon as you get off the plane they give you a plastic cup, a tissue and let you watch porn films.  You must be thinking to yourself in Swahili, what a great place this is, until you get a swatch at the first white woman's fanny you've seen and before you know where you are, you're back where you came from.  Now that's what I call, good ideas in motion.

Sunday, 31 October 2010

EU SPENDS £124K ON SEXUAL DEVIANTS' CONFERENCE!



The European Commission has spent £124,000 on a five day conference for 200 homosexual, bisexual, transgender and "intersex" activists.



European Commission spent £124,000 on gay activists' conference
One of the many baffling sounding workshops was entitled: 'Gender and Sexuality in the Media: the problem is that there is no problem' 

As European leaders grapple with budget pressures, one arm of the European Union is continuing to party.
MPs described the conference as 'political correct drivel'.  A delegate told a D.L. reporter, "I'm neither Homosexual, Bisexual or a Ladyboy but I thought the 'Into sex' part sounded interesting, when the tickets came round the office, but it turned out to be 'Intersex' and to be honest with you although I've sat through 4 days of lectures, I still don't know what the fuck they're talking about.  Indeed after looking the fucking thing up on Wikipedia, I'm still not sure".


I used to enjoy, 'choking the chicken' quite a lot when I was younger.  I wonder if I can sue myself for abuse?


* 'choking the chicken' is a euphemism for wanking.

Tuesday, 12 October 2010

REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE SAYS 'HOMOSEXUALITY IS NOT ACCEPTABLE'.


The Republican candidate for the governor of New York state has been condemned by both conservatives and Democrats for saying that he did not want his children "brainwashed into thinking that homosexuality" was "an acceptable option".

Rabbi Yechezkel Roth, left, and another Orthodox Jewish supporter, center, accompany New York Republican gubernatorial candidate Carl Paladino in the Williamsburg neighborhood of the Brooklyn borough of New York: Anger over 'anti-gay' remarks by candidate for New York governor
New York Republican candidate Carl Paladino in the Williamsburg neighborhood of the Brooklyn borough of New York 
Carl Paladino, a property developer-turned-politician, was accused of raising the risk of attacks on homosexual men. He was trying to strike a contrast between himself and Andrew Cuomo, his Democratic rival, who once took his young daughters to a gay pride parade.
In a television interview yesterday, Mr Paladino said that he did not discriminate against gays, and employed a gay nephew.
But he repeated his opposition to gay marriage and, referring to homosexuality, added: "That's not how God created us, and that's not the example that we should be showing our children".
I think a balance has to be struck on this whole minorities issue.  Research has proved that less than 2% of the adult population of the UK, is Gay or Lesbian or whatever the other thing is.  If you look at the papers and TV programmes you would think that more than half the population was gay.  Take QI for instance, a programme popular with my wife.  The host a Mr Fry, is a Homosexual who claims abstinence from buggery.  The whole programme is laden with references to Homosexuality throughout and in my opinion, shouldn't be shown on the BBC at all.  
This whole agenda has been pushed on British Society along with mass immigration and it is going to lead to riots at some point.  The general population will only take so much.  I realise that minorities have to have rights, but they shouldn't have more rights than the majority.  Homosexuality is not normal or else more than 50% of the population would be doing it, which may be the case for all I know.  But I doubt it!  I wish that we had politicians in this country of the calibre of Mr Paladino, who would stand up for the rights of the majority.

Saturday, 25 September 2010

ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY ADVOCATES GAY PRIESTS!




The Archbishop of Canterbury has said he has "no problem" with gay people being bishops but they must remain celibate.
I don't pretend to know much about a religion which has the head Honcho wearing a nice wee purple dress, but I would have thought if you're going to allow homosexual priests, you've got to let them bugger one another.

Thursday, 17 December 2009

BBC POLL ON EXECUTING HOMOSEXUALS DISAPPEARS SHARPISH!




The BBC was under fire last night for opening a debate on whether gays should be executed.


The broadcaster started a discussion on its BBC News website asking: 'Should homosexuals face execution?'  The question was posed after a proposed law to execute homosexuals was put forward in Uganda.  More than 633 comments were sent to the discussion board, 206 of which were published before it was closed, making it the most popular forum on the website today.


The idea that Homosexuals should be executed is patently ridiculous, but surely the BBC who have a very successful WORLDWIDE SERVICE should be able to discuss it in the context of NIGERIA?