Friday 10 December 2010

WERE STUDENTS CLOSE TO BEING SHOT?



When the students attacked Charles and Horsefaces' car, how close were they to getting shot?

I understand the car, lost the protection of the outriders and police escort as they police stupidly sent them on a route straight into the student protesters.  Now I for one, wouldn't have minded seeing the two old tarts getting a good going over.  The Queen presides over the British Establishment, which the more you look into is, holding back masses of the population, the sheeple, as they have been called.  Never minding, the fact that the establishment, the politicians, the journalists and believe it or not, 60% of new British rock bands, went to Oxbridge, the places won by the 'wrong sort' of students are practically nil.  Students today got a valuable lesson that they should remember for many years to come.  Fuck, I sound like an anarchist!

The only protection the Royals had was from a detective in the car with them.  Now, he would have undoubtedly been armed.  How close was he to pulling his weapon and firing on the Prince's attackers?  Would a couple of students with gunshot wounds, get the people of this country onto the streets?

Personally, I doubt it.  We'll carry on kidding ourselves that we live in a democracy that allows politicians to lie and cheat their expenses and largely get off with it, to the extent that it is still happening.

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

The Royals never had much protection because Britain's too busy paying for Blair's security. LOL

banned said...

My bet is that someone deliberatly sent the royals on that route precisly in the hope that there would be some sort of engagement with the protesters so as to whip middle england against the students.
One all draw I'd say.

The Young Oligarch said...

I'd have shot the c***s .

In fact , I'd hunt them down today and shoot the bastards just so they don't need to worry about their student fees .

Check out what Cranmer has to say about this and their other revolting antics .

http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2010/12/englands-shame.html

Makes me ashamed that I was once a student .

The Young Oligarch said...

Anyway , what's this about "horseface" ?

I've seen that photie you had up on Facebook and you're no oil painting , let me tell you !

Bill said...

Banned has it. Just like the 7/7 bus was the only bus in London diverted from its normal route that day for 'reasons unknown'.

I reckon the 'attacking students' were agent provocateurs and in as much danger of being shot by detective as Charlie and Camilla.

Read The Art of War it's all in there.

Dark Lochnagar said...

Harbingers, that is when he's not out the country getting paid for his reward for setting up Iraq and Afghanistan for the oil companies.

Dark Lochnagar said...

Banned, I wouldn't say you're too far short of the mark, but we've seen it all before.

Dark Lochnagar said...

Oli, FFS look through the news. As an educated man why do you believe the shite that we are fed by the MSM and the Establishment.

Dark Lochnagar said...

Bill, welcome to he blog. I think you're absolutely right. It's exactly the same when see you see those Israeli looking men stirring up the crowd at Muslim demonstrations. If you're a mug you believe all the shite that's flung at you, but I believe there is a growing number of us who are sceptical of what we're told and we have to promote this to the sheeple.

Anonymous said...

I wondered the same thing when I heard this morning DL.

I think the mood is just abut there that if they had shot people because, as Paul Stephenson said this morning "the security had a job to get their principles to their destination by whatever means", the people would have come out en masse and burned Buckingham Palace to the ground.


PS. Is Charlie really the Queen's son. He looks about 20 years older than her. So does his tart.

banned said...

FFS! Telegraph is reporting that the Police protection went all pete tong because they were using the wrong sort of radio and didn't know the riot was happening. Pull the other one mate, it's got fucking bells on.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/theroyalfamily/8195538/Royal-couple-put-in-danger-after-police-radio-failure.html

Major Fuckup said...

banned..
Yes someone is telling porkies. One senior officer was explaining on Sky News that the police watched all the news reports from Sky, BBC etc and used this info with their own intelligence to see the 'bigger picture'.
Then some other senior officer popped up today and said they didn't know there were riots in the West End and anyway we can't talk to the Royal Protection Officers so couldn't warn them anyway. Only concluson is that they wanted to give Charlie and Camilla a good fright and remind them who protects them and that they should keep out of politics.

Dark Lochnagar said...

Tris, aye the whole thing is a bit sniffy. My mother in law was going on about the students kicking a horse and trying to break it's leg. Now how do you turn a nation of animal lovers against the students? Only the sycophants give a fuck about the two old tart parasites!

Dark Lochnagar said...

Banned, do they not have mobiles or when they stopping the signal, so the little dears couldn't call mummy?

Dark Lochnagar said...

Anonymous, too rich for our blood. Some of us are married you know, where the fuck are we going to get £300.

Major Fuckup said...

DL. Aye true. So WTF is going on with the wrong radios bollox story ?
That worked up until about 1973.
Shirley they can think up something better than that ?
My shitty mobile can log onto the internet while taking a photo and texting 24 folk in the contacts section. Could certainly keep in touch with two people at the same time. And it cost £30.