Monday, 30 August 2010

'NANNY STATE' ADVERTISING ESCALATED 3000% UNDER LABOUR!


Spending on the poster, television and cinema campaigns rose 30 fold during Labour's time in power, yet failed to prevent the growth of the "lifestyle" diseases the money was meant to combat.
Over the same period, the number of sexually transmitted infections doubled, while levels of obesity and binge drinking soared.
The new figures, obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, show that Department of Health spending on advertising rose from £2 million in 1997 to £59 million this year.

Yes, more a case, DO WHAT WE TELL YOU, rather than DO WHAT WE DO!
Remember BLAIR in that advert telling us not to over extend on our mortgages as he looks for his TENTH house in the CARIBBEAN?  Remember BROWN telling us to 'BE CAREFUL IN THE OFFICE' , as he flings printers and mobiles about and what about THAT SLIMY FUCKPIG, MANDELSON telling us to practise 'SAFE SEX' when every bastard in Westminster WAS SHAGGING HIM, 'BAREBACK'. 

Aye, just a bunch of VILE, GRASPING BASTARDS.

10 comments:

Mr. Mxyzptlk said...

'BULLSHIT' ESCALATED 3000% UNDER DARK LOCHNAGAR!


YEAH! RIGHT! MOANY OLD GIT!

http://lh4.google.com/bdasgupta/Rv1oleahBTI/AAAAAAAAASQ/iBDEpc1qtFA/buyavowel%5B2%5D.jpg

Dark Lochnagar said...

Nico, thanks for the pic, I'll use that sometime. Less of the fucking old BTW, middle-aged maybe, but old, no!

Dioclese said...

Shouldn't be too difficult to cut the advertising budget then.

I really resent the nanny state doing my thinking for me and telling me what is good for me. I know what is good for me. I have a brain.

Although lots of people don't and maybe that's the point...

Dark Lochnagar said...

Greekers, that and Labour in particular like to exert strict control over the electorate whilst enriching themselves beyond avarice. I thought Brown might at least be different, but I see he's getting the lecture tour lined up along with his book and his job nin the IMF. Mind you, that fucker Blair, makes him look like an amateur! I should have known better.

HeadsonPoles said...

No Government would be brave enough to leave the electorate to their own devices.
An intelligent (not necessarily good) Government would let the people "think" they are doing what they want.

I'd rather they all fuck off to be honest and give me my money back.

INCOMING!!!!!!! said...

I'll bet you DL that every penny was spent on champagne and caviar and Palam Bang ladyboys. Only a very small percentage actually got to delivering the "message". It was "graft" disguised as public service. The new bunch aren't much better, just watch what they'll flog of for pennies that cost us a fucking fortune in debt to construct. Just watch DL, their carpetbagging mates are drooling just round the corner. Fuckedwitz the lot of them.

Dark Lochnagar said...

Headson, but there is a big difference between an intelligent Government and a nannying one. I blame the compensation culture. When I was a boy, if you walked under a painter's ladder and a paintpot fell on you, well that was your fault for being a stupid prick. You didn't expect £100,000 because of the stress caused. That's what Governemnets should be doing, cutting back on the compensation the courts award and letting us get on with our lives and if we make a mistake then that's our fault.

Dark Lochnagar said...

INCOMING!!!!No there not. Half of our assets, like when that fuckwit Brown sold off the gold, will be sold for peanuts and we'll be able to do fuck all about it. Do you know what really get's on my tits. The fact that I didn't have the brains to see how society was going to go. If I had, I could have been a millionaire by now, for doing fuck all.

banned said...

Says on my newest Heinz baked beans tins that they contain "one of your 5 a day". Nice one X-Nu-Labour, get fit&healthy, scoff beans.

Dark Lochnagar said...

Banned, reme,mber that scene from blazing saddles with the cowboys bean eating. Fucking classic.