'BUZZ LIGHYEAR' BEATS NEIL ARMSTRONG TO THE MOON
Buzz Lightyear, the enthusiastic animated hero in Disney's Toy Story, was the first man on the Moon, according to one in ten school pupils.
FUCK ME! Mind you, if you believed the conspiracy theories about the MOON LANDINGS, THEY MIGHT BE RIGHT!
15 comments:
That looks like Elmer Fudd aka Ian Gray !
I thought it was Gordon Brown who saved the Moon.
DL ISN'T hE DOG? Or is that ZOG? OR mAgoG? No it all bollox, teachers will NoT teach anything.
BTW I worship BOG. It can deliver within a three mile radius of anywhere I want to be.
Elmer, you're right. Maybe we could give him a new snappy nickname, something to go with his new zingy personality. No, cooshite Gray isn't what I mean!
Lorenzo, I'll think you'll find that was the universe.
INCOMING!!!!!! Are you pissed again?
DL. Just jumping between your correspondents. But yes,hic, I've been out.
Burp!!
Elmer has been enjoying nice dinners at our expense. I'm sure public bodies shouldn't be feeding political party members.
http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/scotland/Call-for-inquiry--into.6150282.jp
INCOMING!!! Well done, the PC's the last thing I want to see when I've been out!
Another recent poll found that 1 in 100 people think that the head of The Commonwealth is not Her Majesty but....
Bono!
Troughers, thanks for that, I might have missed it as I don't read that particular Labour rag much these days. I was wondering at them running a story criticising Labour and then I remembered it was a Edinburgh paper digging up Glasgow!
It's a Labour supporting paper right enough DL ( mad Maddox etc) but the story must have been brewing under the surface and they probably thought they may aswell get it out first before the even dosier and compliant Herald newspaper got it's shiny arse out of the office and investigated the story.
Trougher, I suppose their jobs are on the line now that the profits of Johnson Press have dropped. That new online Herald is shite anyway.
What do you think of the online Caledonian Mercury ? I'm not into it much with it being Scotsman staff involved. Usual bias has to creep in there. Plus it has a bottomless pit of money behind it which means 'establishment'.
Troughers, I must admit I haven't looked at it for a couple of weeks.
At first I thought it would be independent and new but I was soon demoralised at the old stories and repoerting. As you say I don't like the staff involved or the way they report.
Post a Comment