Monday, 20 September 2010

GAY COUPLES NOT WELCOME IN BED AN BREAKFAST JOINTS!



More than one in eight bed and breakfast owners would not permit same-sex couples to share a bed, according to a recent survey in the 'Telegraph'.

Lesbians I would imagine would be OK, but men might make such a mess of the sheets!

20 comments:

Benedict the 16th said...

Disgraceful. I abhor any kind of discrimination.
Happy oktoberfest..

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/picturegalleries/8013342/Oktoberfest-2010-pictures-from-the-first-two-days-of-the-Bavarian-beer-festival-in-Munich.html?image=5

Dark Lochnagar said...

Benedict, fuck me did you see that bird with the two big ones in front of her. My brother went to that once. If you couldn't get a shag there, you must be a right ugly bastard!

Harbinger said...

DL,

Bottom line is a simple one - liberty. If a person owns a business then it's entirely their prerogative whom they should and shouldn't serve.

People use discrimination now to destroy liberty. No one has the right, let alone the state to tell people how they should live their lives. If people don't want to associate with, serve, or employ anyone, whatever reason that's their prerogative and should be their freedom to do so.

I'm all behind the b&bs quite frankly. Their lives, their business, their choice and no one elses.

Dark Lochnagar said...

Harbingers, it may come as no surprise to any casual readers of this shite to know that I agree with you. But, then, I am homophobic. I can't help it. It's in my make up and it is something I try my best to hide when I am infrequently in the company of Gays, because I am a mannerly person. Like many heterosexual men, I don't mind what they get up to as long as they don't do it anywhere me. It's not the actual friendship bit or even the loving of another man, although I find that strange, but it's the actual sexual act that fill me with disgust, but as an easy going person, I am also able to understand, if they think a bit of fanny munching, is off putting.

My easy going nature, means that if I had a B and B then I wouldn't want them sleeping in a double bed, but I don't mind two women, because although I am homophobic, I can understand the act between two women and if I was a woman myself, my personal preference, would be to be a lesbian. There, I told you it was shite!

Harbinger said...

DL,

Now this I find interesting. Do you know that the period of time when the word homophobia was first penned? Well it was 1969 and guess what religion the person who coined it was? Well some say it's George Weinberg and others say Alvin Goldstein when it first appeared in the magazine Screw in 1969.

Now let's look at the bigger picture here shall we? 1933 the School of Frankfurt left Germany to make the west so corrupt it stank. Communism was already infiltrating the USA by the 60's. The whoel mindset of people was being changed. A classic example: just because you don't associate with blacks in the past was perfectly ok - birds of a feather stick together and all that. However along come psychologists, members of the left, undoubtedly Jewish, very possible communist roots and voila - you're a racist (hate black people) because you choose not to associate with them, even though there was no hatred whatsoever. This is now the automatic reaction to anyone who chooses not to associate with black people. There will come a time in the not too distant future when unless you procreate with a member of another race you will be looked upon as racist and charged accordingly. This is how it begins, drips and drabs here and there until you're being hit by a fucking tsunami!

Going back to homophobia, the "irrational fear of homosexuals". There's nothing irrational whatsoever in not liking something which is completely opposite to nature - man + woman = procreation and promotion of the human race. Whereas as man + man or woman + woman = fuck up within nature, that is unless they were created for the sole purpose of population control, however latest gay rights blow that out of the fucking water don't they?

So here we go a Jew pens the word homophobia and society HAS TO CHANGE its views. Now stop people in schools who don't want to associate with homosexuals (complete against a person's liberty) and actively promote it's ok - brainwashing + propaganda = reprogramming of society. I hate to say it but soon paedophiles will have exactly the same rights to molest children who are currently, through the media (pop, TV & magazines) being sexualised at a very young age (Rhianna, Britney Spears hello?) to a time where they will happily consent to some elder fucks them at the age of 5 and above (or even younger).

Bottom line the freedom to hate, to not like, to not associate with, to avoid, to not employ is 100% the right of the individual. Now think about it DL? How on earth do you get people to accept mass immigration when their culture tells them it's not good? You've got it race laws for them to accept other races. How do you get people to accept homosexuals, completely abnormal within society? Yup, exactly the same.

It's called brainwashing through drips and drabs and total obliteration of liberty so as the NWO can further control our society.

You may find this interesting - (click here).

Harbinger said...

Do I hate homosexuals? Hell no.
Do I disagree with homosexuality? Yes & No. I agree that if they want to do what they want to do then fair enough, but I disagree when they start trying to jump into heterosexual territory (marriage, children, adoption etc).

If people want to shun members of society that's their choice. If children don't want to associate with blacks, Asians or homosexuals that too is their choice and teachers/authority has no right whatsoever to force them to do otherwise - again brainwashing and persecution in order for people to accept - communist tactics of totalitarian control.

Harbinger said...

DL, do me a favour and publish the post before last as it's gone into your spam bin.....again.....

Harbinger said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Dark Lochnagar said...

Harbingers, no, I don't hate them either. I don't understand them but in some ways I thole them. Good Scots word. I don't give a fuck what they do if it's in the privacy of their own homes, I really don't. What does get on my tits, is when I get their shite, metaphorically speaking, pushed in my face through 'Gay Pride' marches and being told I can't discriminate against them. Now, I don't particularly want to discriminate, but I'm just the kind of awkward cunt, that is someone tells me something, I'll do the opposite just for the sake of it! Beware the 50ish year old man. They no longer give a fuck, at least in my case. If I'm outspoken then, that's too fucking bad. I certainly don't agree with homosexuals being able to adopt children, it's not natural and no one will convince me otherwise. Did you get a chance to peruse that site I left over at your's?

Dark Lochnagar said...

Harbingers, thinking about my last sentence there, you will no doubt tell me it's a Zionist plot, which it probably is. I'm just too trusting.

Harbinger said...

DL,

No, not at all. I'm really just trying to get around Judaism, the Torah and the Talmud. Remember that at the time of Christ he speaks out against the traditions of the Elders which was written down later as the Babylonian Talmud.
Like I said, I'm still waiting to buy Judaism Discovered. He's done a hell of a lot of research in writing this book and would have written far more had (Hoffman) he the finances.

Remember also that Orthodox Jews are against Israel for the simple reason that it's not supposed to be there as it's an illegal state yet the Rabbis worship the Talmud before the Bible/Torah.

banned said...

"although I am homophobic, I can understand the act between two women", liar, it just turns you on, as it does many men.

I'm all for freedom too, both of the B&Bs freedom not to allow folks whose behaviour, on their private property, might disgust them but I'm also in favour of the freedom of gay persons to do what they want to each other in their private proerty (which in law includes a rented room).

Hotels and B&Bs can ban smoking in their rooms even though they are not obliged to do so by the smoking ban so they should also be able to ban homosexuals.
All it need take is a discreet notice in their advertising and signage
"No Benders! would do the trick.*
I remember a sign outside a road cafe near Penistone in Yorkshire, out in the middle of no-where.
"No hikers, no campers, no bikers" and thought to myself, that's just about your whole fucking customer base out here mate'.

*Sorry if I offend your burgeoning gay readership DL.

Dark Lochnagar said...

Harbingers, Ah but, you speak of Christ speaking out. Do you then recognise Christ, what as a Scholar, a preacher or the 'son of God'. I come from the point of view that I don't believe in the God figure therefore everything that stems from that is shite because neither Mohammed or Christ can be the sons of God, because he doesn't exist. Personally I don't give a fuck what Rabbis are worshipping because one religion is as bad as the other. What I am fearful of and anti, is the NWO and the Zionist control of society.

Dark Lochnagar said...

Banned, nothing could be further from the truth. If I was a woman, I would be a Lesbian because I wouldn't want some hairy cunt lying on top of me and finally ejaculating over my bed and making me lie in it. The thought of two women feeling each other, licking each other's nipples, having a 'grind', licking each other's fannies finally sticking a dildo up their arses as they come, isn't doing anything for me at all. I'll be back in a minute.

Harbinger said...

DL,

I recognise Christ for the good person he was that promoted love and peace above all.
He stated he was the son of God but then are we not all the children of our creator? You either believe in a creator or you don't. I do.
Muhammad was a prophet of Allah. He has more in common with the pagan Moon God cult than the bible. In Islam however Christ is revered as a prophet not as the son of God.

When you look back at what Christ did, especially the turning over of the money lenders tables, we see that he saw the danger of usury then. Look at the situation today?

And as for Rabbis, there's a massive difference to what Rabbis and Imams are preaching compared to those who follow the true teachings of Christ as both are polar opposite.

Well, regarding the NWO and Zionism, I no longer fear them, for they have an adversary, a very strong and powerful one. In fact they are even more powerful than the NWO and I really mean that. I'll be writing about it some time on the blog.

Dark Lochnagar said...

Harbingers,I don't believe in a creator, so there you and I differ. If your assertion that the Jews were kicked out of England in the 12th century is correct and I'm sure it is, it could be that the story of the money lenders and their tables was added at a later stage in the King James version of the bible.
I look forward to your news about the demise of the NWO.

Harbinger said...

We're all different.
The Jews were expelled from Britain under Edward 1st Edict of Expulsion 1290 (end of the 13th Century). It still stands to this day and has never been repealed. So all Jews in the UK are living here illegally under British law. That's fact.

As for the money lenders in the King James' bible well, considering that the Bible was composed of written scriptures which state this then I don't think the propaganda story holds water DL. It was this act that really got him noticed as a rowdy individual by the Sanhedrin because the money lenders outside the temple were undoubtedly sharing their profits with the Pharisees. Christ's depiction in the Bible is one of a revolutionary, whom today would certainly be under lock and key.

It is easy to assume that the money lenders was written in as propaganda to fulfill the Edict of Expulsion of 1290 and promote anti semitism but remember DL, it was written between 1400 and 1800 and considering that Cromwell allowed the Jews back into the UK (unofficially and illegally) he could easily have rewritten the bible to state that the money lender scene never happened couldn't he, or at least those who came after him? The rise to power of Cromwell and the execution of the King in England heralded in a new age in the UK. The plague, great fire and establishment of the Bank of England happened not long after and this was all because he had allowed expelled Jews back in even though the edict stated that any Jew left in England after 1290 would be executed.

Jewish usury has always been a bone of contention with every nation's inhabitants, Jews have lived with. This has been one of the reasons they've been evicted from every land they've been in.

The Koran specifically forbids usury.

When was the Bible written?

Dark Lochnagar said...

Harbingers, That was interesting about the Bible. I hadn't realised that the Torah consisted of the first five books of the Old Testament. So when they were expelled from England is there any information that they came to Scotland or did they spread to the Continent?

Harbinger said...

DL,

There is much you and most of society haven't a fucking clue about when it comes to Judaism.

Time to fall further down the unbrainwashed bunny hole.....

Dark Lochnagar said...

Harbingers, I'm getting there slowly and surely. I'm so far down the arsehole now, I can smell the shite.