Ministers have been forced to seek permission from Prince Charles before passing laws in at least a dozen separate areas during the past five years, it emerged last night.
Freedom of Information requests revealed ministers from six departments have sought the Prince of Wales’s consent on legislation in areas ranging from road safety and energy reforms to gambling and planning.
The requirement stems from a little-known constitutional right for the prince to effectively veto legislation in areas which might affect his private interests.
RIGHT THAT'S IT. THE GLOVES ARE OFF! FROM NOW ON, I'M JUST GOING TO SAY WHAT I THINK!
Showing posts with label PRINCE CHARLES AND POLITICS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PRINCE CHARLES AND POLITICS. Show all posts
Monday, 31 October 2011
WHY DOES THIS ARSEHOLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO VETO LAWS?
Sunday, 12 September 2010
THE QUEEN'S WORTH A FORTUNE, THE NATION NEEDS IT MORE!
How much is the queen worth?
Now when you add in her blue chip shares, etc, etc, her wealth comes out at something like £17billion. Much of this wealth is controlled by the Bank of England Nominees Ltd, which just don't give out information. This wealth is invested by a coterie of Jewish Bankers including the Rothschilds, who made friends through various means with her antecedents. Remember as well, the information that comes across her desk. If for instance the Foreign Office warns about a military coup in Nigeria, she can shift her investments out of that country sharpish. Who is ever going to charge the Queen with, 'insider trading'?
Now I accept that much of this wealth is owned by the state, but the only person who has the authority to say ,what is owned by us and by her, is the Queen herself. It's even a bigger disgrace than the expenses fiasco.
In this time of belt tightening, is it not about time that some of this wealth came back into the Treasury, never mind paying her to open a few fetes and Parliament, twice a year.
Thursday, 17 December 2009
PRINCE CHARLES INTERFERES IN POLITICS!
A Cabinet minister was lobbied by aides of the Prince of Wales over the design of eco-towns within hours of being appointed, it has emerged.
The letter to Hazel Blears, from a director at the Prince’s Foundation for the Built Environment, suggested that the towns should follow the design principles of his neo-Georgian village of Poundbury. It has again raised questions about the extent of the Prince’s involvement in political affairs.
The letter, and further communications from directors at the charity requesting — successfully — to meet ministers to discuss housing policy, have been released by the Government following a series of freedom of information requests. Documents obtained by The Guardian also reveal that Prince Charles wrote personal letters to at least eight government departments since 2006. The contents of these letters were not released by the Government.
The letter to Hazel Blears, from a director at the Prince’s Foundation for the Built Environment, suggested that the towns should follow the design principles of his neo-Georgian village of Poundbury. It has again raised questions about the extent of the Prince’s involvement in political affairs.
The letter, and further communications from directors at the charity requesting — successfully — to meet ministers to discuss housing policy, have been released by the Government following a series of freedom of information requests. Documents obtained by The Guardian also reveal that Prince Charles wrote personal letters to at least eight government departments since 2006. The contents of these letters were not released by the Government.
JUST WHO does the JUG-EARED TWAT think he is?
BLEEDIN' ALAN SUGAR?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)