WIND FARMS-ARE THEY GOOD OR BAD-YOU DECIDE

I've not really made up my mind about WIND FARMS.  Do we need to care about climate change?  If so, is Nuclear a better option than wind?  Here's some good and bad points:

Arguments in favour of wind farms

• The UK needs to meet a target to generate 15 per cent of energy from renewables by 2020 as part of global plans to fight climate change.
• The technology produces no greenhouse gases once it has been installed.
• Wind farms will decrease reliance on volatile energy supplies from abroad.
• Manufacturing and installing wind farms in the UK will provide ‘green jobs’
• The technology is becoming cheaper as wind farms are built around the world.

Arguments against wind farms

• The turbines usually have to be sited in isolated windy spots, that are also often areas of outstanding natural beauty.
• The noise from wind turbines has been blamed for health problems including stress and insomnia.
• Wind turbines only work at maximum capacity for a third of time, meaning they have to be backed up by other technologies such as coal and nuclear.
• The inconsistent power generated by by wind farms requires the grid to be upgraded to cope with the surges in power.
• Wind farms are expensive to build and only last up to 25 years. 

WHAT DO YOU THINK??  There's a poll on right for your votes.  Comments as usual are very welcome.

U.N. SCIENCE REPORT ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE IN HIMALAYAS WAS SHITE!

Claims by the world's leading climate scientists that most of the Himalayan glaciers will vanish within 25 years were last night exposed as SHITE.

The alarmist warning appeared two years ago in a highly influential report by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.  The report said that glaciers in the Himalaya were 'receding faster than in any other part of the world'.  But the experts behind the warning have now admitted their claim was not based on hard science - but a story that appeared in the "VIZ" magazine,  on a page about the 'TWO FAT SLAGS' in the late 1990s.

That story was itself based on a telephone conversation with an Indian scientist who, was a Curry chef in the evenings at the BOMBAY TAJ MAHAL, (open Tue-Sun 5-11.30p.m., closed Mon-Chicken Jalfraizi a speciality, Wednesday's buffet night-all you can eat 5 Rupees, tel.  Mumbai 235-9871),  has since admitted it was little more than speculation.  The revelation is a major blow to the credibility of the IPCC which was set up to provide political leaders with clear, independent advice on climate change and to predict Barbecue Summers and mild Winters.

As one, (that's me),  has said before, it's time we got this climate shite sorted out once and for all so that everyone on the planet knows what the score is.

AL GORE MAKES AN ARSE OF IT IN COPENHAGEN

There are many kinds of truth. Al Gore was poleaxed by an inconvenient one yesterday and frankly made AN ARSE OF HIMSELF.


Mr Gore, speaking at the Copenhagen climate change summit, stated the latest research showed that the Arctic could be completely ice-free in five years.  In his speech, Mr Gore told the conference: “These figures are fresh. Some of the models suggest to Dr [Wieslav] Maslowski that there is a 75 per cent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during the summer months, could be completely ice-free within five to seven years.”

However, the climatologist whose work Mr Gore was relying upon dropped the former Vice-President in the water with an icy blast.  “It’s unclear to me how this figure was arrived at,” Dr Maslowski said. “I would never try to estimate likelihood at anything as exact as this.”  Mr Gore’s office later admitted that the 75 per cent figure was one used by Dr Maslowksi as a “ballpark figure” several years ago in a conversation with Mr Gore.

This subject is TOO IMPORTANT FOR POLITICIANS.  Especially FUCKING OLD HAS-BEENS.  We have to have a WORLDWIDE SCIENTIFIC SEMINAR where politicians are not allowed, to thrash this subject out ONCE AND FOR ALL.  If it's happening, we have to do something about it.  But, if it's not, we can't SACRIFICE OUR FUTURE PROSPERITY to stop something that's NOT GOING TO CHANGE OUR LIVES!

A BETTER WAY TO SPEND CLIMATE CHANGE, AID MONEY?

BTW THE BLACK TWAT AT THE END THINKS HE'S  FUCKING SAMMY DAVIS

Jonah Brown has told the Climate Change conference in Copenhagen that we , the rich western countries, should give the third world poor countries at least £70billion in Aid ever year.  Britain's share of that would be £1 billion and as a percentage Scotland's share would be around £100 million.  I don't believe in it, but the money will be paid.

But I've got a better idea.  Scotland has a blossoming Natural  Resources Industry, so instead of giving it to big, sweaty, fat Dictators who will piss it up against the wall or worse stick it in their accounts in Switzerland, why don't we spent it in Scotland developing our skills and encouraging this new industry.

It will at least be reasonably accounted for and will help unemployment and therefore help us to get out of the recession.  But that would be too sensible for Brown, he wants to save the World, one Dictator at a time.

MET OFFICE CHECKS DATA FOR 160 YEARS IN QUESTIONING CLIMATE CHANGE

The Met Office plans to re-examine 160 years of temperature data after admitting that public confidence in the science on man-made global warming has been shattered by leaked e-mails.


The new analysis of the data will take three years, meaning that the Met Office will not be able to state with absolute confidence the extent of the warming trend until the end of 2012.  The Met Office database is one of three main sources of temperature data analysis on which the UN’s main climate change science body relies for its assessment that global warming is a serious danger to the world. This assessment is the basis for next week’s climate change talks in Copenhagen aimed at cutting CO2 emissions.


The Government is attempting to stop the Met Office from carrying out the re-examination, arguing that it would be seized upon by climate change sceptics.

Or is it as we thought that CLIMATE CHANGE is just an excuse for MORE TAXES and a tightening of AUTHORITARIAN RULE. 

ARSEHOLE AND BANANA BOY'S BROTHER HATCH UP NEW TAX

BROWN AND MILLIBAND HAVE A GOOD LAUGH AT OUR EXPENSE!

Gordon Brown today sparked fears of soaring air fares by calling for a £60billion-a-year international fund to help poor nations adapt to climate change, partly funded by aviation taxes.
The Prime Minister said developed countries should make the massive pot of money available to developing nations so their economies could grow even as they adapt to the changing global climate - and he committed Britain to paying its 'fair share'.
Mr Brown said some of the cash could be raised from international aviation and shipping, through taxes or by including these in carbon emissions trading markets.



So in other words after TAXING US TO THE FUCKING HILT, the BASTARDS are now going to charge us out of our meagre annual holidays, while they fly around the world in FIRST CLASS ON THEIR EXPENSES.

And how much do they think that our "ALLIES" the U.S.A. are going to pay towards this strategy? Well I can tell you now, FUCK ALL!

So as usual the country with the most ambitious targets for climate control, Scotland, will pay more in taxes than the WORLD'S BIGGEST POLLUTER, THE U.S.A.

I don't blame the Americans for this but everything in this country now is taxed to "HELP THE PLANET".

BUY A HOUSE ON A HILL AND GET SOME FISHING RODS!