AN INTERESTING VIDEO ABOUT LIBYA, NATO AND THE NWO. WORTH A VIEW.

DAVID CAMERON GRANTED ASYLUM BY SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT

David Cameron, (that's him in the black shirt) has today been granted asylum by the Scottish Government.

There were fears that forces loyal to Muumaar Gaddafi, the LIBYAN LEADER, were going to bomb Downing Street and Chequers in retaliation for NATO air strikes in their own country.

Scottish First Minister, Alex Salmond, told reporters that while they did not agree with his politics, his father was Scottish and he would be welcomed in the new Scotland.

LIAM FOX REALLY IS A STUPID PRICK!

"The Royal Air Force will receive 14 new Chinook helicopters in a £1 billion contract, the Ministry of Defence announced today.

The aircraft are vital to Nato operations in Afghanistan.

He added the Government had brought "reality" to the defence budget which can now deliver real equipment". (They were ordered initially by the Labour Government)

Only one problem there Liam.  The helicopters aren't due to be delivered until 2015, by which time we are supposed to be out of Afghanistan.  Is there something you're not telling us?  Or are you just a prick?  Or both?  Which is more likely.  Or maybe you think we are, pricks.   Which is even more likely than that!

Why are we spending £1 billion on military equipment to use in other countries that have fuck all to do with us anyway?

IT'S NOT WORKING IN LIBYA!

UPDATE*5 INSTANCES OF NATO BOMBING INNOCENT CIVILLIANS*

Well here we are 4 months into our 'war' with Gaddafi.  We're a few weeks away from Ramadan, when most Arab countries will shut down, it being in the middle of summer this year.

We were told that Gaddafi and his family would have cracked by now, but his son has just made a broadcast on French TV saying that they'll never surrender.  As I've outlined on here before, the rebels are a ragtag army of misfits, from genuine Gaddafi haters to Islamic militants.  The only thing that appears to be cracking is the will of NATO to take the fight to the dictator's family.  The Italian PM Berlusconi, has said that he was against it from the start, the Germans are not committing any forces and most of the military might is from France and the UK.

Meanwhile our politicians are more wrapped up in a phone hacking scandal than the welfare of our troops, who if this 'war' is to be properly actioned will have to be sent in on the ground to help the so called rebels, who if they win against Gaddafi will be fighting us as we try and get our hands on their oil, which as we all know is the reason we're there in the first place!

JUST WTF ARE WE DOING IN LIBYA?

DANNY ALEXANDER A GINGER TWAT

*UPDATE* GOOD ARTICLE HERE

Just what the fuck are we doing in Libya?

As the West’s war against Libya has entered its fourth month and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization has flown more than 11,000 missions, including 4,300 strike sorties, over the small nation, the world’s only military bloc is already integrating lessons learned from the conflict into its international model of military intervention based on earlier wars in the Balkans, Afghanistan and Iraq.  What targets are we bombing for fuck's sake?  We are told that our air strikes are so accurate we can take out the top two floors of a building and leave the rest intact.  So why isn't Gaddafi's regime on it's knees by now?  

It's not that accurate though, NATO has just killed 9 civilians, confirmed by them.  The Gaddafi regime has seized on the casualties, including a mother and father and at least two young children, to score propaganda points against NATO and to bolster Libya's embattled dictator. 

So what about the cost?  The ginger turd above, a poor excuse for a Scotsman, IMO, has just said on TV that, "the campaign is costing tens of millions, potentially into the hundreds of millions as it goes on, but that money is coming from the reserve that we have set aside, precisely for contingencies such as this."

That's alright then!  Is it any wonder that the British people are beginning to question the whole operation as it drags into it's fourth month.  We all know it's got fuck all to do with protecting civilians from Gaddafi.  Most of the so called 'civilians' have been rebel troops.  It's all part of a grand scheme to take over Libya and install a puppet government, enabling NATO to move against Syria, where the majority of the population are loyal to Assad.  Ultimately of course, the plan is to invade Iran.  This is the plan being pushed by the Zionist hawks in the Obama administration.  Perhaps World War 3 is not that far away if both China and Russia decide to thwart the NATO expansionist plans!

AM I THE ONLY ONE GETTING INCREASINGLY FRUSTRATED WITH ALL THIS LIBYAN SHITE?

UPDATE: FOR A REALLY GOOD ANALYSIS, (NOT THE USUAL SHITE WE ARE FED) HAVE A LOOK AT THIS


The picture above purports to be of pro-Qaddafi forces' vehicles being hit by NATO forces fire.  Two things are important about this photo:

1. It's the same one, differently framed as the 'Maley Dail' used last week and
2. It shows you what a ragtag army the Libyan State Army is.

Whether you agree or not that Qaddafi is a 'BLOOD CRAZED' dictator or not, (if he was blood crazed why was Blair meeting him), what is indisputable, is that, Libya is one of the more progressive Arab Nations, where women are educated and have rights that women in other Arab states, notably Saudi Arabia, would die for, if you take my meaning.  The West has used the last three decades bringing the Qaddafi regime, 'in from the cold'.  But, the West when operating in this region has to play to the interests of The House of Saud and the Israelis, whose interests coincide in many cases as they both want to see stable Governments and if that means, blood crazed dictators so be it.  The Arab League's permission for the NO FLY ZONE was only brokered after the Saudis were allowed to nip next door to put down a rebellion which threatened their own security.


This is not a GULF WAR scenario.  The Rebel forces consist of about 1500 men who drive up and down the coast road in an assortment of pick up vans and ONE TANK which they have 'liberated' from somewhere.  It says a lot about the capabilities of the State Forces that they haven't been able to put them out of commission and it's probably only the NATO strikes that stops that.  Who are these rebel forces anyway?  We're told by the MSM, that they're infested with Al Qeada sympathisers.  


Maybe we're better off with Qaddafi, a reasonably benign dictator, by the standards of the region,  who's oil we can exploit.  But, I suppose it's too late for that now.  Anyone want to have bets, when the first coalition ground forces will be used?

WHO IS A DISASTER, AN EMBARRASSMENT TO BRITAIN AND EARNS MORE THAN OBAMA?-BARONESS ASHTON

Yet after only 100 days in the job as the EU's top diplomat, the consensus on 53-year-old Cathy Ashton is that she is also one of the worst politicians on the international stage.  There have been so many gaffes in such a short space of time that there are now serious questions over whether she can survive to the end of the year - let alone until 2014, when her lucrative contract is due to expire.

Yesterday, it emerged that David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, had written to her giving her blunt advice on how to do the job properly and it's a SAD DAY when BANANA BOY gives advice to anyone on how to do a job!
The woman has been picked from obscurity to a job she is not suited for with a salary of £328,000 when she would be better suited to running a parish council.  She decided last week instead of going to a meeting of EU Defence Ministers with NATO officials to go to the inauguration of the pro-Russian, Ukrainian Prime Minister.  A throwback from her days in the CND?

The woman is an embarrassment to Britain and the sooner she is throw to the wolves and gets her £464,000 payoff and £64,000 pension the better and Brown should pay it personally for foisting this idiot on the EU.

ARMED FORCES WILL HAVE TO RELY ON ALLIES TO FIGHT FOREIGN WARS

Britain’s Armed Forces face inevitable cuts that will leave the country “dependent” on allies to fight future conflicts, ministers are to admit.

The country can no longer afford to fund current operations in Afghanistan and all the equipment now on order for the Armed Forces, a Ministry of Defence green paper will make clear.  Dark Lochnagar has seen a copy of the paper, which will be published on Wednesday.  The stark admission from Bob, the knob Ainsworth, the defence secretary, will undermine Gordon Brown’s attempts to claim Labour is committed to big defence projects like the Royal Navy’s new aircraft carriers and the new fighters to fly from them.

And that's the way it should be.  The armed forces are costing £700 for every citizen of the U.K. and I believe IT IS TIME our so called E.U. and NATO 'partners' bore more of the brunt.  If Latvia and Estonia and all the rest of them can't send TROOPS TO FIGHT then they should be PAYING FOR OURS. 

If the idea of the EU was to stop major European wars, which so far it has, (but many of us believe the HUN WILL TRY AGAIN), then it's time we had a properly funded, equipped and manned European Army to fight in Afghanistan, albeit under British commanders.  Furthermore, why do we need NUCLEAR ARMS when the FRENCH AND THE AMERICANS have BETTER ONES THAN OURS?